| From: | "Gilberto Castillo" <gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | gilberto(dot)castillo(at)etecsa(dot)cu, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, "pgsql-advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-09 21:16:44 |
| Message-ID: | 58029.192.168.207.54.1462828604.squirrel@webmail.etecsa.cu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> On 05/09/2016 02:04 PM, Gilberto Castillo wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/09/2016 01:58 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>
>>>> So this is probably just highlighting how I'm not up to date on the
>>>> -advocacy discussion :) But I thought the idea was to have it
>>>> integrated, and that *that* was "the product" in this case. As in the
>>>> "breaker that makes it possible to do transparent upgrades without
>>>> external products". Which I thought was the target for next release,
>>>> not
>>>> this release. But I may be confusing multiple discussion, and as such
>>>> contributing to the confusion.
>>>
>>> Yeah, there's multiple discussions, at least 2:
>>>
>>> 1. Should we promote pglogical in the beta as something to *test*?
>>>
>>> 2. Is pglogical a major-version-making feature?
>>>
>>
>> In my opinion when we have a visual environment full amdinistración
>> included in the core, will be version 10 while not.
>
> That is not in anybody's plans for PostgreSQL. Assuming you mean a GUI?
Yes, Here everything compared to MS-SQLServer and Oracle wise it is topic.
--
Saludos,
Gilberto Castillo
ETECSA, La Habana, Cuba
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-05-09 21:26:18 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Josh berkus | 2016-05-09 21:12:22 | Re: [MASSMAIL]Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |