Re: Adding CI to our tree

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date: 2021-10-03 04:05:17
Message-ID: 57E51EBA-2B92-43BB-9F0F-E4AFAB001020@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On October 2, 2021 1:18:38 PM PDT, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>> On 2 Oct 2021, at 22:01, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> On 2021-10-02 20:42:00 +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> Same, and for my case I run several CI jobs to compile/test against different
>>> OpenSSL versions etc.
>>
>> On that note: Did you do this for windows? If so, I'd rather not figure that
>> out myself...
>
>Not with Cirrus, I've been using Appveyor for Windows and they provide 1.0.2 -
>3.0.0 which can easily set in config.pl with for example:
>
> $config->{openssl} = 'C:\OpenSSL-v111-Win64';

Got the build part working (although the state of msvc compatible openssl distribution on windows seems a bit scary). However the ssl tests don't fully succeed:

https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6264790323560448?logs=ssl#L655

I didn't see code in the bf client code running the test so perhaps that's not too surprising :/

Did you run those tests on windows?

Regards,

Andres

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-10-03 07:03:59 Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test - take three - remastered set
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-10-03 03:48:06 Re: BUG #16040: PL/PGSQL RETURN QUERY statement never uses a parallel plan