| From: | Basil Bourque <basil(dot)list(at)me(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SSDs with Postgresql? |
| Date: | 2011-04-28 22:27:04 |
| Message-ID: | 57D29247-23B3-4197-9450-879982D0DCE8@me.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Instead of the usual SSD, you may want to consider the 'ioDrive' products from "Fusion-io".
http://www.fusionio.com/
This company makes enterprise-class storage on a board populated with flash and managed by their own supposedly-sophisticated drivers. The board + drivers are meant to get around the problems of SSDs, such as write-failures. They make both SLC and MLC products, at different sizes, to meet different budgets and purposes.
I tried them about 3 years ago on a database server (not Postgres). The real-world speed was excellent, yet disappointing in that it performed as well as our high-end RAID-10 from HP. We were looking for even more speed, and were promised that, but did not see it in our trials.
Caveats:
• This was using their first attempt at Windows drivers.
• We may not have tuned the settings properly.
In the end, we chose to keep our RAID for the time being.
So, while I can't specifically recommend their products, I certainly suggest considering them. They have drivers for Linux and Windows, but apparently their rumored Mac OS X drivers never came to fruition.
Other benefits beyond speed include size, power, and heat. An internal board with flash saves on all three, compared to a RAID made of either discs or SSDs.
--Basil Bourque
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Felder | 2011-04-28 23:00:50 | Re: SSDs with Postgresql? |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2011-04-28 21:44:37 | Re: New feature: skip row locks when table is locked. |