| From: | Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joe Conway <joe(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs |
| Date: | 2022-03-17 16:19:24 |
| Message-ID: | 57B89D6F-3676-4DD8-A1E3-63BFE0BCFDA6@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Mar 17, 2022, at 9:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> not just in terms of telling other people how they have to write
> their patches.
...
> the burden of maintaining relatively little-used features
> should fall entirely on people who don't care about them.
Joshua helped test the DAC portion of this patch, and answered a number of my questions on the topic, including in-person back in December. I take your point, Robert, on the general principle, but the archives should reflect that Joshua did contribute to this specific patch.
Joshua, should we drop the DAC portion for postgres 15 and revisit the issue for postgres 16? I think it's getting late in the development cycle to attempt what Tom described upthread, and I'd hate to see the rest of this patch punted.
—
Mark Dilger
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zheng Li | 2022-03-17 16:22:46 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-03-17 16:18:51 | Re: Granting SET and ALTER SYSTE privileges for GUCs |