Re: problem with partitioned table and indexed json field

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Raphael Bauduin <rblists(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: problem with partitioned table and indexed json field
Date: 2013-11-07 18:24:20
Message-ID: 5798.1383848660@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I wrote:
> It looks like the problem is we're building a MergeAppend plan and not
> getting the targetlist for the MergeAppend node right.

Found it --- simple oversight in building optimized min/max plans.
If you need a patch now, see
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=patch;h=5d0731da521f090f80ea39529fe274ac6d6bffa1

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Burek 2013-11-07 19:07:33 Re: Is it advisable to pg_upgrade directly from 9.0 to 9.3?
Previous Message Jeff Ross 2013-11-07 16:29:23 Re: After upgrade to 9.3, streaming replication fails to start--SOLVED