| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Santiago Zarate <santiago(at)zarate(dot)net(dot)ve>, PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Uber moving towards MySQL |
| Date: | 2016-07-26 22:00:20 |
| Message-ID: | 5797DD74.309@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 07/26/2016 02:57 PM, Santiago Zarate wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Has anyone read the following article?, i'm personlally inclined to
> think that some of these problems could have been addressed with enough
> expertise.
It is being discussed on -hackers and -general right now.
>
> At our company we may move to PostgreSQL for one of our core products
> (we use oracle), and a colleague came with this today. While this
> started a very heated discussion on our side... I wonder, what do you
> guys think
I think they have some valid points, especially around:
Inefficient data replication
Poor replica MVCC support
Difficulty upgrading to newer releases
Whilst Berkus brought up:
Inefficient architecture for writes
They are all good points but Oracle certainly has its own list too.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2016-07-26 22:37:35 | Re: Uber moving towards MySQL |
| Previous Message | Santiago Zarate | 2016-07-26 21:57:28 | Uber moving towards MySQL |