Re: psqlODBC 09.05.0200 Released

From: "Inoue, Hiroshi" <h-inoue(at)dream(dot)email(dot)ne(dot)jp>
To: Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Hiroshi Saito <hiroshi(at)winpg(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: psqlODBC 09.05.0200 Released
Date: 2016-07-24 22:12:11
Message-ID: 57953D3B.8030006@dream.email.ne.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-announce pgsql-odbc

On 2016/07/24 17:09, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi Hiroshi,
>
> On Sunday, July 24, 2016 12:19:01 PM CEST Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
>> On 2016/06/28 17:52, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 5:36:43 AM CEST Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
>>>> Did any platform succeed (e.g. Intel64)?
>>> No. Looks like x86_64/i686 is in the best condition, we apply only one
>>> downstream patch in Fedora (revert of the MONEY [1] fix which I believe should
>>> be reverted upstream) and then the testsuite succeeds.
>>>
>>> To build on armv7hl, we apply [2].
>> Could you try the attached patch on armv7hl?
> of course. Submitted build (for i686, x86_64 and armv7hl):
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15001892
> .. and all arches passed testsuite, thanks!
>
> There is just the remaining MONEY [1] revert patch.

It's difficult to revert the commit because the functionality exists
before 9.5.
I'm inclined to omit 2 cases in trouble from param-conversions-test for
the time being.
Is it OK?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2016-07-24 23:45:54 == PostgreSQL Weekly News - July 24 2016 ==
Previous Message Pavel Raiskup 2016-07-24 16:19:41 Re: psqlODBC 09.05.0200 Released

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Raiskup 2016-07-25 07:34:01 Re: psqlODBC 09.05.0200 Released
Previous Message Pavel Raiskup 2016-07-24 16:19:41 Re: psqlODBC 09.05.0200 Released