| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Jules Bean <jules(at)jellybean(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance on inserts |
| Date: | 2000-10-15 21:52:52 |
| Message-ID: | 5788.971646772@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
>>>> What is the status of partial indices?
>>
>> They've been diked out of gram.y's syntax for CREATE INDEX at least
>> since Postgres95. No way to tell who did that, why or when, AFAIK.
>> There is still an awful lot of support code for them, however.
> It may have been me. Not sure. At the time, no one was sure what they
> did, or if we even wanted them. They were broken, I think.
Wasn't you unless you were hacking the code before it entered our CVS
system. I checked the oldest CVS version (Postgres95 release) and saw
that partial indexes were disabled in gram.y in that version.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-15 21:55:22 | Re: Performance on inserts |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-15 21:51:48 | Re: Performance on inserts |