| From: | Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs? |
| Date: | 2016-07-08 03:13:54 |
| Message-ID: | 577F1A72.4050303@catalyst.net.nz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 08/07/16 02:09, Wes Vaske (wvaske) wrote:
> ?The Crucial drive does not have power loss protection. The Samsung drive does.
>
>
> (The Crucial M550 has capacitors to protect data that's already been written to the device but not the entire cache. For instance, if data is read from the device during a garbage collection operation, the M550 will protect that data instead of introducing corruption of old data. This is listed as "power loss protection" on the spec sheet but it's not the level of protection that people on this list would expect from a drive)
>
Yes - the MX200 board (see):
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9258/crucial-mx200-250gb-500gb-1tb-ssd-review
looks to have the same sort of capacitors that the M550 uses, so not
ideal for db or transaction logs!
Cheers
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jean-David Beyer | 2016-07-08 10:23:38 | Capacitors, etc., in hard drives and SSD for DBMS machines... |
| Previous Message | Kaixi Luo | 2016-07-07 21:06:53 | Re: Tuning guidelines for server with 256GB of RAM and SSDs? |