Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres

From: Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)8kdata(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres
Date: 2016-06-24 18:35:25
Message-ID: 576D7D6D.4050701@8kdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 24/06/16 14:23, Flavius Anton wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Flavius Anton <f(dot)v(dot)anton(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Flavius Anton <f(dot)v(dot)anton(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> I'd love to talk more about this.
>>> I thought quite a bit about this a few years ago but never really
>>> picked up it to work on.
> Any other thoughts on this? My guess is that it might be an important
> addition to Postgres that can attract even more users, but I am not
> sure if there's enough interest from the community. If I want to pick
> this task, how should I move forward? Do I need to write a design
> document or similar or should I come up with a patch that implements a
> draft prototype? I am new to this community and don't know the code
> yet, so I'd appreciate some guidance from an older, more experienced
> member.
>
>

Other than protobuf, there are also other serialization formats
that might be worth considering. Not too long ago I suggested working
specifically on serialization formas for the json/jsonb types:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/56CB8A62.40100%408kdata.com I
believe this effort is on the same boat.

Álvaro

--

Álvaro Hernández Tortosa

-----------
8Kdata

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-06-24 18:39:01 Re: Cleanup in contrib/postgres_fdw/deparse.c
Previous Message Flavius Anton 2016-06-24 18:23:24 Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres