Re: R: Vacuum full: alternatives?

From: Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>
To: Job <Job(at)colliniconsulting(dot)it>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: R: Vacuum full: alternatives?
Date: 2016-06-20 10:13:13
Message-ID: 5767C1B9.2040200@a-kretschmer.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Am 20.06.2016 um 11:43 schrieb Job:
> Hi Andreas,
>
>> I would suggest run only autovacuum, and with time you will see a not
>> more growing table. There is no need for vacuum full.
> So new record, when will be pg_bulkloaded, will replace "marked-free" location?

exactly, that's the task for vacuum

Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melvin Davidson 2016-06-20 12:28:52 Re: R: Vacuum full: alternatives?
Previous Message Robert Wysocki 2016-06-20 10:09:46 Re: R: Vacuum full: alternatives?