From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: IsUnderPostmaster with shared_preload_libraries on Windows |
Date: | 2016-06-13 22:55:16 |
Message-ID: | 575F39D4.1020604@joeconway.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/13/2016 01:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> Is it expected that IsUnderPostmaster is true during postmaster startup
>> in an extension's _PG_init() when preloading under Windows? On Linux it
>> is false at this point AFAICT.
>
> AFAIK it will be false in the *postmaster's* execution of _PG_init().
> But keep in mind that on Windows each exec'd child process will have to
> load the shared_preload_libraries again for itself, and those executions
> should see IsUnderPostmaster = true. I think what you are seeing is
> additional executions in the startup process or other background
> processes, which don't happen in a forked-children environment.
>
> You can probably duplicate this behavior for testing purposes on Unix
> by compiling with EXEC_BACKEND defined, if that helps.
Thanks, definitely easier to debug on Linux. It appears the best answer
is to use process_shared_preload_libraries_in_progress rather than
trying to derive that information using IsUnderPostmaster.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-14 02:09:30 | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-13 22:44:58 | Re: ERROR: ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in targetlist |