From: | "Inoue, Hiroshi" <h-inoue(at)dream(dot)email(dot)ne(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: psqlODBC 09.06.0400 Released |
Date: | 2017-07-21 09:43:32 |
Message-ID: | 5750aa41-a005-21a9-0c38-a7835a1647bc@dream.email.ne.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-announce pgsql-odbc |
Hi Christian,
On 2017/07/21 16:28, Inoue, Hiroshi wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> Thanks for the report.
> It would take some time for me to examine it.
Could you please try the test drivers 9.6.0401 at
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/inocchichichi/entrance/psqlodbc/
<http://www.ne.jp/asahi/inocchichichi/entrance/psqlodbc/>
?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
>
>
> regards,
> Hiroshi Inoue
>
> On 2017/07/20 23:07, Christian Ullrich wrote:
>> * Hiroshi Saito wrote:
>>
>>> We are pleased to annouce the release of psqlODBC 09.06.0400.
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> this release changes the behavior of linked tables in MS Access 2016
>> (x86). With 9.6.310, all is well, with .400, for some tables the data
>> looks good, some are entirely filled with "#Deleted".
>>
>> Most interestingly, however, for some tables, exactly 9 out of every
>> 10 rows in datasheet view are "#Deleted". Specifically, there are
>> always nine rows like that, followed by one with valid data. If I
>> change the sort order of any column, I get a screenful of valid rows,
>> except for the selected row; that one stays at "#Deleted".
>>
>> Changing sort order always jumps the view back up to the first row;
>> when I scroll down, everything below the first page is still similar
>> to before; nine rows #Deleted, one row valid, repeat. The pattern
>> resumes at the page edge, i.e. if the window does not show a multiple
>> of 10 rows the valid rows after scrolling down will be different ones
>> than before.
>>
>> I have switched back and forth between .310 and .400 a few times,
>> with reproducible results each time.
>>
>> There is no apparent correlation between .400's behavior for any
>> given table and the content of that table. ISTR that Access likes
>> timestamp columns for identifying rows; none of my tables have any.
>>
>> The behavior is the same with default data source options and with
>> these nondefault options:
>>
>> - "Row Versioning" enabled
>> - "True is -1" enabled
>> - "Bools as Char" disabled
>>
>> In my experience, these settings are necessary for Access to work at
>> all.
>>
>> Screenshot attached
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Inoue, Hiroshi | 2017-07-21 09:45:43 | Re: psqlODBC 09.06.0400 Released |
Previous Message | Inoue, Hiroshi | 2017-07-21 07:36:34 | Re: psqlODBC 09.06.0400 Released |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Inoue, Hiroshi | 2017-07-21 09:45:43 | Re: psqlODBC 09.06.0400 Released |
Previous Message | Inoue, Hiroshi | 2017-07-21 07:36:34 | Re: psqlODBC 09.06.0400 Released |