Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ReadBuffer(P_NEW) versus valid buffers
Date: 2006-09-24 02:00:36
Message-ID: 575.1159063236@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> The check looks good - are we chasing up the Linux kernel (or Suse) guys
> to get the bug investigated?

I asked around inside Red Hat but haven't gotten any responses yet ...
seeing that it's a rather old Suse kernel, I can understand that RH's
kernel hackers might not be too excited about investigating. (Alan Cox,
for one, has got other things to worry about this weekend:
http://zeniv.linux.org.uk/%7etelsa/boom/

I believe Dan's busy updating his kernel --- if a current Suse kernel
still shows the problem then he should definitely file a bug with them.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-24 02:09:03 Re: PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 Now Available
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2006-09-24 01:44:09 PostgreSQL 8.2beta1 w/ VALUES