Re: RLS related docs

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RLS related docs
Date: 2016-05-30 20:56:37
Message-ID: 574CA905.2040101@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/26/2016 12:26 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 25 May 2016 at 02:04, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> Please see attached two proposed patches for the docs related to RLS:
>>
>> 1) Correction to pg_restore
>> 2) Additional mentions that "COPY FROM" does not allow RLS to be enabled
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>
> The pg_restore change looks good -- that was clearly wrong.
>
> Also, +1 for the new note in pg_dump.

Great, thanks!

> For COPY, I think perhaps it would be more logical to put the new note
> immediately after the third note which describes the privileges
> required, since it's kind of related, and then we can talk about the
> RLS policies required, e.g.:
>
> If row-level security is enabled for the table, COPY table TO is
> internally converted to COPY (SELECT * FROM table) TO, and the
> relevant security policies are applied. Currently, COPY FROM is not
> supported for tables with row-level security.

This sounds better than what I had, so I will do it that way.

Thanks,

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-05-30 21:14:26 Re: [GENERAL] Permission Denied Error on pg_xlog/RECOVERYXLOG file
Previous Message Joe Conway 2016-05-30 20:54:21 Re: Does people favor to have matrix data type?