Re: Getting error 42P02, despite query parameter being sent

On 11/16/24 03:15, Achilleas Mantzios wrote:
>
> Στις 16/11/24 12:55, ο/η Max Ulidtko έγραψε:
>> Greetings, group!
>>
>> I'm trying to understand a low-level issue. Am evaluating a new client
>> library for Postgres; it's not particularly popular / mainstream, and
>> as I've understood so far, sports an independent implementation of PG
>> binary protocol.
>>
>> The issue I'm hitting with it is exemplified by server logs like this:
>>
>> 2024-11-16 10:28:19.927 UTC [46] LOG: statement: SET client_encoding =
>> 'UTF8';SET client_min_messages TO WARNING;
>> 2024-11-16 10:28:19.928 UTC [46] LOG: execute <unnamed>: CREATE VIEW
>> public.foobar (alg, hash) AS VALUES ('md5', $1);
>
> At least for SQL level prepared statements the statement has to be one of :
>
> |SELECT|, |INSERT|, |UPDATE|, |DELETE|, |MERGE|, or |VALUES|
>
> |so CREATE is not valid, and I guess the extended protocol prepared
> statements aint no different in this regard.

It would seem so. Using psycopg:

import psycopg
from psycopg import sql

con = psycopg.connect("postgresql://postgres:postgres(at)127(dot)0(dot)0(dot)1:5432/test")
cur = con.cursor()
cur.execute("CREATE VIEW public.foobar (alg, hash) AS VALUES ('md5',
%s)", ['test'])

IndeterminateDatatype: could not determine data type of parameter $1

cur.execute(sql.SQL("CREATE VIEW public.foobar (alg, hash) AS VALUES
('md5', {})").format(sql.Literal('test')))

con.commit()

cur.execute("select * from foobar")
cur.fetchone()

('md5', 'test')

> |
>
>> 2024-11-16 10:28:19.928 UTC [46] DETAIL: parameters: $1 =
>> 'test-param-value'
>> 2024-11-16 10:28:19.928 UTC [46] ERROR: there is no parameter $1 at
>> character 57
>>
>> Of course, I /am/ passing a value for parameter $1; and I can trace
>> that the client lib sends it out on the wire as expected. (Attaching
>> packet captures.)
>>
>> Heck, even the PG server itself says, DETAIL: parameters: $1 =
>> 'test-param-value' — so it sees the parameter! But then, immediately
>> unsees it.
>>
>> Am I being hit by a PG bug? Is this a known issue?
>>
>> I'd retested with master version of that client library, and against 6
>> latest major versions of PostgreSQL server (12 throughout to 17). No
>> difference across versions spotted; the result is consistently error
>> 42P02.
>>
>> Is the client library doing something wrong? How can the server claim
>> there's no parameter $1 immediately after logging its value it has
>> received?
>>
>> I did minify a 100-line SSCCE that reproduces the issue and can be shared.
>>
>> Any advice, or pointers on what to check next besides delving into PG
>> source, I'd greatly appreciate. Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Max
>>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com