| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | "Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: MySQL/InnoDB benchmarks |
| Date: | 2002-02-21 06:00:57 |
| Message-ID: | 5748.1014271257@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Now, the InnoDB guys have done some benchmarks:
If I did some benchmarks comparing Postgres and MySQL, and they came out
in favor of PG, I'm sure the MySQL guys would cry foul --- and with good
reason, seeing that I have no clue how to configure MySQL optimally.
But we are supposed to consider their tests to be unbiased? Get real.
What really needs to be done here is a set of tests designed and
conducted by an *impartial* third party, with advice from experts in
each camp on how to properly configure their own DB. I haven't seen
any prospects for such a thing to happen, though. In the meantime,
I put no credence in MySQL-sponsored benchmarks, and I see no reason
for us to spend time generating our own equally-not-unbiased responses.
Let's get on with our development work rather than worrying about FUD.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2002-02-21 06:08:12 | ASSERTIONS |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-21 05:50:08 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0 ?? |