From: | David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: left join with OR optimization |
Date: | 2012-01-24 15:27:25 |
Message-ID: | 57433E42-5269-4104-BF69-05D8C0F71500@yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
What version of PostgreSQL?
On Jan 24, 2012, at 9:28, Sim Zacks <sim(at)compulab(dot)co(dot)il> wrote:
> I've seen written that a b-tree index can't be used on a join with an
> OR. Is there a way to optimize a join so that it can use an index for a
> query such as:
>
> select
> a.partid,a.duedate,coalesce(a.quantity,0)+sum(coalesce(b.quantity,0))
> from stat_allocated_components a
> left join stat_allocated_components b on a.partid=b.partid and
> b.quantity>0 and
> (a.duedate>b.duedate or (a.duedate=b.duedate and a.popartid>b.popartid))
> where a.quantity>0
> group by a.partid,a.duedate,a.quantity
>
> Where I am doing a self join to get a running sum, but some rows have
> the same due date so I am saying if the due date is the same then the
> first one entered should be considered earlier.
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-24 15:27:41 | Re: left join with OR optimization |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2012-01-24 15:04:37 | Re: PG 9.0 EBS Snapshot Backups on Slave |