| From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-13 21:06:26 |
| Message-ID: | 573641D2.5000204@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/13/2016 02:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I still don't like that much, and just thought of another reason why:
> it would foreclose doing two major releases per year. We have debated
> that sort of schedule in the past. While I don't see any reason to
> think we'd try to do it in the near future, it would be sad if we
> foreclosed the possibility by a poor choice of versioning scheme.
Well, we have done two major releases in a year before, mostly due to
one release being late and the succeeding one being on time.
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2016-05-13 21:12:29 | Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-13 21:00:59 | Re: 10.0 |