Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-05-13 20:04:52
Message-ID: 57363364.5000905@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/13/2016 12:03 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 05/13/2016 11:48 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> Anyway, all of this is a moot point, because nobody has the power to
> tell the various companies what to do. We're just lucky that everyone
> is still committed to writing stuff which adds to PostgreSQL.

Lucky? No. We earned it. We earned it through years and years of hard
work. Should we be thankful? Absolutely. Should we be grateful that we
have such a powerful and engaged commercial contribution base? 100%.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-05-13 20:15:47 Re: 10.0
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-05-13 20:03:32 Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0