Re: When should be advocate external projects?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: When should be advocate external projects?
Date: 2016-05-12 21:15:15
Message-ID: 5734F263.5030204@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 05/12/2016 02:02 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 12 May 2016, at 21:58, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:46:25PM +0100, Justin Clift wrote:
>>> On 12 May 2016, at 21:24, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

>>>> I think our wiki page that lists all the FDWs is great, so why can't we
>>>> do this for other external software?
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers
>>>
>>> That page does seem well put together. Guess the main question now is
>>> "who will drive this initiative?"

IMO:

A much better solution is to rework the software catalogue to properly
highly open source "projects" versus "products" and allow people to
manage via a moderated interface their own listings. It will be
consistent, provide a central place within the primary domain and be
lower overhead than a wiki.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2016-05-12 21:16:41 Re: When should be advocate external projects?
Previous Message Justin Clift 2016-05-12 21:02:23 Re: When should be advocate external projects?