| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
| Date: | 2016-05-12 00:53:17 |
| Message-ID: | 5733D3FD.2010401@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/11/2016 05:51 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> The idea that the concrete we poured 15 years ago never needs to be
> inspected for upgrade is a very poor way to insure the integrity and
> strength of the foundation.
>
>
> Right. Most importantly, we fail to mention the backup utilities that
> every user should use and know about, and we fail to point users at
> connection poolers despite not incorporating one in core.
>
> Whatever the outcome with pglogical I'd love to see that change. And no,
> I don't think "use the wiki" is good enough.
You are absolutely right.
J
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2016-05-12 08:23:13 | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2016-05-12 00:51:32 | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |