From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Rajeev rastogi <rajeev(dot)rastogi(at)huawei(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: My mail to pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org not reached |
Date: | 2016-05-11 18:54:25 |
Message-ID: | 57337FE1.4060503@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 05/11/2016 07:49 AM, Rajeev rastogi wrote:
> On 11 May 2016 11:02, David G. Johnston Wrote:
>
>
>
>>Just to clarify - is it your complaint that the email that you linked is supposedly not being delivered or did you send a different email that wasn't delivered?
>
>>Assuming the first situation:
>
>>I'm not sure what you mean by "also"...I did receive it and since you sent it may be the case that you personally wouldn't notice its delivery.
>
>>Its presence on the website via the link you provided proves it was delivered to the list.
>
>>It may be a issue local on your end.
>
>>In any case I am not involved with administrative aspects of the website and other postgresql.org <http://postgresql.org> infrastructure.
>
>>David J.
>
>>P.S. quick reminder - we prefer to bottom-post (or inline) posts on these lists. top-posting is disliked.
>
>
>
> Yes I meant the first one (i.e. the mail which I linked was supposedly
> not being delivered).
>
> Since you have received mail, may be then some issue with local network
> (my colleague working in same network zone so he also not received this
> mail).
>
>
>
> Sorry to disturb you. I thought no one has received this mail.
well it would be easier to diagnose the issue if you could give us an
emailaddress that should have received the mail but did not...
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajeev rastogi | 2016-05-12 03:32:47 | Re: My mail to pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org not reached |
Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2016-05-11 15:25:47 | Re: Request for editor privileges |