Re: status/timeline of pglogical?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
Date: 2016-05-11 17:21:41
Message-ID: 57336A25.9020802@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 05/11/2016 09:35 AM, Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 05/11/2016 07:25 AM, Dave Page wrote:

>> The idea that the concrete we poured 15 years ago never needs to be
>> inspected for upgrade is a very poor way to insure the integrity and
>> strength of the foundation.
>
> And the idea of redesigning the foundation without barely a nod to the
> thought process behind the original design is also not a good idea.

Well I certainly wasn't trying to do that and really I wasn't trying to
"promote" one solution over another as much as build stronger
relationships with our external community. Perhaps there is a better way
to do that than acknowledgement in a press release.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2016-05-11 17:53:53 Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2016-05-11 17:16:05 Re: status/timeline of pglogical?