From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
Date: | 2016-05-10 18:10:43 |
Message-ID: | 57322423.1060409@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/10/2016 10:55 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 10 May 2016 at 06:39, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
> <mailto:petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>> wrote:
>
>
> Okay, that should not be a problem (provided that debs and rpms are
> enough). But would be good to get early access to pgdg beta1
> packages then so that we can build pglogical against them in time. I
> admit I have not much idea of how the release packaging is coordinated.
>
>
>
> I've prepped pglogical rpms for 9.6 and uploaded to the main pglogical
> repo Petr linked to earlier. I had to base them on temporary home-brewed
> Pg 9.6 rpms pending release of the official ones.
Wow, fast.
> Anyway, once the required Pg packages are on PGDG repos it's very quick
> to rebuild the debs and rpms for pglogical. If I'm not awake (+0800
> Western Australia time) Petr will be so one of us can kick off a build
> and we'll have packages something like half an hour later.
OK. Is there a page I can link to for pglogical which is not a
2ndQuadrant corporate page? Something on github, maybe?
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-05-10 19:18:49 | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2016-05-10 17:58:54 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |