Re: status/timeline of pglogical?

From: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
Date: 2016-05-10 18:10:43
Message-ID: 57322423.1060409@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 05/10/2016 10:55 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 10 May 2016 at 06:39, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
> <mailto:petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>> wrote:
>
>
> Okay, that should not be a problem (provided that debs and rpms are
> enough). But would be good to get early access to pgdg beta1
> packages then so that we can build pglogical against them in time. I
> admit I have not much idea of how the release packaging is coordinated.
>
>
>
> I've prepped pglogical rpms for 9.6 and uploaded to the main pglogical
> repo Petr linked to earlier. I had to base them on temporary home-brewed
> Pg 9.6 rpms pending release of the official ones.

Wow, fast.

> Anyway, once the required Pg packages are on PGDG repos it's very quick
> to rebuild the debs and rpms for pglogical. If I'm not awake (+0800
> Western Australia time) Petr will be so one of us can kick off a build
> and we'll have packages something like half an hour later.

OK. Is there a page I can link to for pglogical which is not a
2ndQuadrant corporate page? Something on github, maybe?

--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Jelinek 2016-05-10 19:18:49 Re: status/timeline of pglogical?
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2016-05-10 17:58:54 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0