| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Date: | 2016-05-09 23:13:16 |
| Message-ID: | 5731198C.9090904@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/09/2016 03:52 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> 1. Should we promote pglogical in the beta as something to *test*?
>
> If it's the latter, then we don't promote third-party products in beta
> announcements; 2ndQuadrant can make their own announcements about
> pglogical in accordance with
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/NewsEventsApproval just like anyone
> else.
Right. I don't have a problem and am actually 100% behind
cross-promoting "projects" but products are a business problem not a
.Org problem.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh berkus | 2016-05-09 23:19:29 | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-05-09 23:11:46 | Re: Beta1 announcement: alpha1 draft |