From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love |
Date: | 2006-09-11 00:25:17 |
Message-ID: | 5731.1157934317@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> Should untsearch2.sql be renamed to uninstall_tsearch2.sql to be
> consistent with all the other uninstall scripts?
Yeah, that and lo_drop are outliers that probably ought to be renamed.
Offhand I don't see any serious compatibility objection --- who does
module removals except by hand? --- but if anyone sees a problem
speak now ...
I'm also wondering why the heck contrib/lo installs lo_test.sql.
That ought to be a regression test anyway, and we don't install
regression scripts.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-11 00:30:30 | Re: Lock partitions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-10 23:59:58 | Re: Fixed length data types issue |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-11 02:10:55 | Re: contrib uninstall script fixes |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-09-10 23:52:37 | Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love |