| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |
| Date: | 2016-05-09 17:04:16 |
| Message-ID: | 5730C310.709@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 05/09/2016 10:02 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 09:53 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
>> 3. is it ready for playing with now? can people get as far as test
>> setups with it?
>
> Play with? Yes. I have been testing it since 1.0. 1.1 is on my list this
> week, it supposedly fixes a few things that i ran into but see my
> comment about communication. Whether or not it is production ready still
> remains to be seen, there are way too many, "It through this error, what
> does it mean" and "Why doesn't the documentation tell me X?"
Sigh... not enough coffee: "threw" not "through" and of course a missing ?
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-05-09 18:26:00 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-05-09 17:02:24 | Re: status/timeline of pglogical? |