Re: inheritance, and plans

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inheritance, and plans
Date: 2009-02-07 17:39:24
Message-ID: 5730.1234028364@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

=?UTF-8?Q?Grzegorz_Ja=C5=9Bkiewicz?= <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> with a little help on Irc from Andrew (RhodiumToad) I got it 'fixed',
> but I know this is just a hack:

You seem to be laboring under the delusion that this is considered a
bug. It's a necessary semantic restriction, because the pushed-down
expression could mean different things when applied to different
data types.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2009-02-07 17:43:44 Re: inheritance, and plans
Previous Message Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz 2009-02-07 17:23:40 Re: inheritance, and plans