Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6
Date: 2016-05-05 17:36:44
Message-ID: 572B84AC.2080900@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/05/2016 10:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've pushed a first cut at release notes for 9.6. There's a good deal
> of work to do yet:
>
> * The section about parallel query could probably stand to be fleshed out,
> but I'm unsure what to say. Somebody who's worked on that should provide
> some text.
>
> * Bruce usually likes to sprinkle the notes with a whole lot of links
> to the main docs. I've only bothered with links for new GUCs and system
> views.
>
> * As is somewhat customary for early drafts of the notes, I've made no
> attempt to call out which are the most significant changes. I've not
> tried to isolate the non-backwards-compatible items, either.
>
> Please review and comment before Monday, if you can.

Just for the cheap seats, I assume they are pushed to git?

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-05-05 17:43:37 Re: New pgbench functions are misnamed
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-05-05 17:32:55 Initial release notes created for 9.6