Re: release management team statement on patch reverts

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: release management team statement on patch reverts
Date: 2016-05-04 20:36:21
Message-ID: 572A5D45.4030005@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/04/2016 01:03 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Just my .02, pretty sure the majority of the community says, "TGL just sent
>> -1, argument over." That may or may not be a good thing but his experience
>> and depth of knowledge of our code base pretty much seals it for most of us.
>
> Sure, but Tom is also human, and sometimes doesn't like things that
> other people still think are good ideas. Tom questioned whether
> parallel query was really a good idea, and also Hot Standby. If we'd

Like you said, he is human ;)

> given up on having those features when Tom opened his mouth, we'd be
> worse off today.
>
> That is not to say that we shouldn't defer to Tom's judgement in many
> cases. And I do.

Right and I agree with that. I was just saying that in this particular
case, I think a lot of people were just accepting on the single -1.

JD

>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-05-04 20:37:52 Re: pg9.6 segfault using simple query (related to use fk for join estimates)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2016-05-04 20:07:01 Re: modifying WaitEventSets (was: Performance degradation in commit ac1d794)