From: | Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Docbook 5.x |
Date: | 2016-05-04 14:44:34 |
Message-ID: | 572A0AD2.2070909@purtz.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Hello,
I measured following elapsed times on an Intel i5 processor:
1. generate all HTML files with dsl script (make html): 0:48 min.
2. generate all HTML files with xslt script (make xslthtml): 16:01 min.
3. generate all HTML files with xslt script in the new environment
(pure Docbook5): 4:07 min.
4. Generating different things via dsl scripts in the new environment
may be possible. But the changelog of the Docbook5 dsl scripts
shows, that the last modification occurred in 2004 - this way is a
dead end.
There is one principle and a lot of minor differences between 2 and 3.
Solution 2 is based on an xml-file and xslt scripts which are based on
Docbook4. The basic difference to 3 is, that in 3 everything is Docbook5
compliant: there are only Docbook5 xml- and xslt-files (as my workflow
is: db4 --> xml --> db5 -- (db5 xslt) --> html). The minor differences
concerns the fact, that actually there are errors in my xml files and
that I made only a few parameterisation to the Docbook5 standard xslt
files - no optimization at all.
I used following tools: perl, xmllint and xsltproc. osx and OpenJade are
obsolete in the new environment (so far, there is much more work to do).
Jürgen Purtz
On 03.05.2016 22:13, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com <mailto:alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Jürgen Purtz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > actually we use DocBook V4.2 for the PostgreSQL manuals. I
> suggest an
> > upgrade to DocBook 5.x. This sounds simple, but it will be a
> long process
> > with many sub-tasks.
>
> Yes, agreed. The killer objection placed last time was that it took
> something like 10x longer to generate the HTML using the XML-based
> toolchain than the SGML-based ones. If this is not fixed, let's
> forget
> about this whole thing until it is. So, would you time the process
> using both toolchains and report back?
>
>
> As it stated in
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/562E061B.1090809@postgrespro.ru
> the xml performance may be greatly improved. Alexander, what is
> current state of art of your patch ? How slow is xml in compare to sgml ?
>
>
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> <mailto:pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-05-04 14:51:17 | Re: Docbook 5.x |
Previous Message | Alexander Law | 2016-05-04 14:40:45 | Re: Some minor error fixes |