From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Slawomir Nowakiewicz <slawomir(dot)nowakiewicz(at)rubix(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16549: "CASE" not work properly , the function works properly on PostgreSQL 9.6.8 |
Date: | 2020-07-22 22:17:26 |
Message-ID: | 57211.1595456246@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> What is interesting - it fails only when the subquery is in CASE condition
> expression. If is somewhere else, then it doesn't fail
If eval_const_expressions can simplify the CASE test condition itself
to constant-true or constant-false, then it throws away the unreachable
result expression(s) without const-simplifying them. So even if there
would have been a run-time error there, you don't see it.
Of course the error can only happen because we're trying to generate a
custom plan for the expression (with plpgsql variable values inserted
as constants not params). That's a bit silly in this example, but
it wouldn't happen if there weren't a sub-SELECT in the expression.
That forces use of the full planner and plancache machinery.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-07-22 22:38:50 | Re: BUG #16476: pgp_sym_encrypt_bytea with compress-level=6 : Wrong key or corrupt data |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-07-22 22:16:10 | Re: BUG #16550: Problem with pg_service.conf |