From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW |
Date: | 2016-04-26 12:45:59 |
Message-ID: | 571F6307.4070600@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
While re-reviewing the fix, I noticed that since PQcancel we added to
pgfdw_xact_callback to cancel a DML pushdown query isn't followed by a
ROLLBACK, the connection to the remote server will be discarded at the
end of the while loop in that function, which will cause a FATAL error
of "connection to client lost". Probably, that was proposed by me in
the first version of the patch, but I don't think that's a good idea.
Shouldn't we execute ROLLBACK after that PQcancel?
Another thing I noticed is, ISTM that we miss the case where DML
pushdown queries are performed in subtransactions. I think cancellation
logic would also need to be added to pgfdw_subxact_callback.
Comments are welcome!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2016-04-26 12:50:30 | Re: postgres_fdw : Not able to update foreign table referring to a local table's view when use_remote_estimate = true |
Previous Message | José Luis Tallón | 2016-04-26 11:23:11 | Re: Protocol buffer support for Postgres |