Re: BUG #14109: pg_rewind fails to update target control file in one scenario

From: Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: John Lumby <johnlumby(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #14109: pg_rewind fails to update target control file in one scenario
Date: 2016-04-25 14:53:19
Message-ID: 571E2F5F.4080500@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 25/04/2016 16:36, John Lumby wrote:
>> From: michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com
>> To: johnlumby(at)hotmail(dot)com
>> CC: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:48 PM, John Lumby <johnlumby(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Note the difference in timeline
>>
>> Yes, and? System A is still on its previous timeline 11, and will jump
>> to timeline 12 once it has connected back. That's possible since 9.3.
>
> Answering your "and?" : In my testing,
> "and no WAL replicated from B, new Primary , to A , new Standby".
> That is why I concluded there is a bug.
> Also on System A (new Standby) timeline did not jump up to 12, it remained at 11.
> Are you indicating that the admin (me) needs to do something to make that happen?
> If so what?
>

Did you set the recovery_target_timeline parameter to "latest" in the
recovery.conf file? (see
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/recovery-target-settings.html).

--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message jdnelson 2016-04-25 15:33:24 BUG #14113: LIKE <parent> INCLUDING STORAGE bug?
Previous Message georg.kahest 2016-04-25 14:37:39 BUG #14112: sorting v and w is broken with et_EE locate