From: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: should we allow users with a predefined role to access pg_backend_memory_contexts view and pg_log_backend_memory_contexts function? |
Date: | 2021-10-13 00:26:47 |
Message-ID: | 5718CE57-72E4-4D24-BE43-1281B29BF02A@amazon.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/9/21, 2:12 AM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's the v1, please review it further.
Thanks for the patch.
- /* Only allow superusers to log memory contexts. */
- if (!superuser())
+ /*
+ * Only superusers or members of pg_read_all_stats can log memory contexts.
+ */
+ if (!is_member_of_role(GetUserId(), ROLE_PG_READ_ALL_STATS))
I personally think pg_log_backend_memory_contexts() should remain
restricted to superusers since it directly impacts the server log.
However, if we really did want to open it up to others, couldn't we
add GRANT/REVOKE statements in system_functions.sql and remove the
hard-coded superuser check? I think that provides a bit more
flexibility (e.g., permission to execute it can be granted to others
without giving them pg_read_all_stats).
Nathan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2021-10-13 00:30:09 | Re: BUG #17220: ALTER INDEX ALTER COLUMN SET (..) with an optionless opclass makes index and table unusable |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-10-13 00:16:57 | Re: Inconsistency in startup process's MyBackendId and procsignal array registration with ProcSignalInit() |