Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2
Date: 2016-04-20 22:05:17
Message-ID: 5717FD1D.6000303@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 4/20/2016 2:51 PM, drum(dot)lucas(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> 1 - The customer can add any value into users.code column
> 2 - The customer can chose between *add or no**t* add the value on
> users.code column
> 3 - If users.code is null (because the customer's chosen not to add
> any value in there), a trigger/function has to do the job.
> 4 - the function/trigger add the next available value, which the
> default is 1000 and it's stored on companies.client_code_increment

why don't you use a SEQUENCE for this?

... DEFAULT nextval('sequencename') ...

initialize the sequence to 1000.

done.

still sounds pretty sketchy.

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2016-04-20 22:07:05 Re: Function PostgreSQL 9.2
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2016-04-20 22:02:52 Re: Add relcreated (timestamp) column to pg_class catalog to record the time an object was created