Re: Enhancement request for pg_dump

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Sergei Agalakov <Sergei(dot)Agalakov(at)getmyle(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, melvin6925(at)gmail(dot)com, wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com
Subject: Re: Enhancement request for pg_dump
Date: 2016-04-18 14:09:11
Message-ID: 5714EA87.2050905@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 04/17/2016 06:10 PM, Sergei Agalakov wrote:
> Thank you, I know this place.
> I just wanted to check that my request will have the peoples support.
> So far it doesn't. It looks like that or people never need to compare
> two PG databases to find the differences in the schemas or security,
> or happy to use the third party tools to do it, and don't want any
> native support. If I see any support from other people for this idea
> then I shall
> go to https://postgresql.uservoice.com/forums/21853-general, but looking
> on, say, "Partitions in Oracle style" that are marked as have been
> started in 2010
> (sure, INHERITANCE is so much Oracle style partitions!) I don't see it
> to be very useful.

Honestly I did not know that site existed. If you want some traction on
this I would suggest the traditional way.

If you think it is a bug:
http://www.postgresql.org/support/submitbug/

If you think it should be a new feature then make your case on --hackers:
http://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-hackers/

FYI, the place I look for requested features is the Todo list:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo

>
> Sergei
>
>> fyi, if you have a feature request or enhancement, then the proper
>> place for that is here ->
>> https://postgresql.uservoice.com/forums/21853-general
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2016-04-18 14:12:31 Re: pg_basebackup: return value 1: reason?
Previous Message Day, David 2016-04-18 13:43:58 Re: understanding postgres backend process memory usage