| From: | José Luis Tallón <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parser extensions (maybe for 10?) |
| Date: | 2016-04-13 15:21:52 |
| Message-ID: | 570E6410.1060906@adv-solutions.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/13/2016 04:43 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 13 April 2016 at 22:11, José Luis Tallón
> <jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net <mailto:jltallon(at)adv-solutions(dot)net>> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> I can certainly prepare a small patch for the first commitfest of
> 9.7 if this sounds viable.
>
>
> I'd be surprised if it was popular.
I am familiar with some cases where it would have been a lifesaver....
> It's hard to imagine a way to do it robustly when dealing with
> pre-lexer input, unless you're doing simple pattern matching to
> identify and replace whole statements.
INDEED. No intention whatsoever to do much more than that O:-)
/ J.L.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-13 15:27:09 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-13 15:18:01 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |