| From: | tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <julien(dot)rouhaud(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)lisasoft(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Andreas Ulbrich <andreas(dot)ulbrich(at)matheversum(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: Choosing parallel_degree |
| Date: | 2016-04-12 08:06:54 |
| Message-ID: | 570CAC9E.5090509@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/11/2016 09:14 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> postgres=# explain analyze verbose select * from abd where n<=1;
>>> >>ERROR: requested shared memory size overflows size_t
>>> >>
>>> >>if we remove the analyze keyword then query running successfully.
>>> >>
>>> >>Expected = Is it not better to throw the error at the time of setting
>>> >>max_parallel_degree, if not supported ?
>> >
>> >+1
> It surprises me that that request overflowed size_t. I guess we
> should look into why that's happening. Did you test this on a 32-bit
> system?
No, I tested on 64 bit machine.
--
regards,tushar
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2016-04-12 08:18:21 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Code cleanup in the wake of recent LWLock refactoring. |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2016-04-12 07:19:46 | Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics |