Re: Top features in 9.6?

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Top features in 9.6?
Date: 2016-04-12 06:06:00
Message-ID: 570C9048.1050403@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 2016/04/12 11:46, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Josh berkus (josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com) wrote:
>> So, let's make a list.
>>
>> Mine:
>>
>> * parallel query (seqscan & aggregation)
>> * bloom filter supporting indexes
>>
>> The generic progress reporting framework is tempting, but seems hard to
>> explain as a marquee feature. What else have we got?
>
> I like the progress reporting, we need to do that with a lot more stuff.
>
> postgres_fdw join pushdown is pretty huge.
>
> Relation extension speed improvements are pretty huge too.
>
> snapshot_too_old is quite important in some environments.
>
> Degree-based geometry funcs
> Phrase full text search
> jsonb_insert
> Index-only scans with partial indexes was improved
> synch_commit = 'remote_apply'

I think "No more full-table vacuums [1]" sounds like it could be mentioned
more prominently. People are quite excited about it [2].

Thanks,
Amit

[1] http://rhaas.blogspot.jp/2016/03/no-more-full-table-vacuums.html
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11311208

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Umair Shahid 2016-04-12 07:04:55 Re: Does someone want to learn how to do the beta annoucement?
Previous Message Darren Duncan 2016-04-12 03:33:15 Re: Top features in 9.6?