From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Top features in 9.6? |
Date: | 2016-04-12 06:06:00 |
Message-ID: | 570C9048.1050403@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 2016/04/12 11:46, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Josh berkus (josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com) wrote:
>> So, let's make a list.
>>
>> Mine:
>>
>> * parallel query (seqscan & aggregation)
>> * bloom filter supporting indexes
>>
>> The generic progress reporting framework is tempting, but seems hard to
>> explain as a marquee feature. What else have we got?
>
> I like the progress reporting, we need to do that with a lot more stuff.
>
> postgres_fdw join pushdown is pretty huge.
>
> Relation extension speed improvements are pretty huge too.
>
> snapshot_too_old is quite important in some environments.
>
> Degree-based geometry funcs
> Phrase full text search
> jsonb_insert
> Index-only scans with partial indexes was improved
> synch_commit = 'remote_apply'
I think "No more full-table vacuums [1]" sounds like it could be mentioned
more prominently. People are quite excited about it [2].
Thanks,
Amit
[1] http://rhaas.blogspot.jp/2016/03/no-more-full-table-vacuums.html
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11311208
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Umair Shahid | 2016-04-12 07:04:55 | Re: Does someone want to learn how to do the beta annoucement? |
Previous Message | Darren Duncan | 2016-04-12 03:33:15 | Re: Top features in 9.6? |