Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

From: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Date: 2016-04-11 18:51:45
Message-ID: 570BF241.8080701@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 04/11/2016 11:50 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Shrug, o.k., like I said -- just ideas off the keyboard. However, that
> doesn't reduce the quality of some of the other ideas (like making sure
> we get something like a DZone interview).

That would be nice. Know anyone there?

--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-04-11 18:53:17 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-04-11 18:50:20 Re: 9.6 -> 10.0