From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Date: | 2016-04-11 17:57:16 |
Message-ID: | 570BE57C.8080607@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/11/2016 10:46 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Doesn't match my experience at all. The vast majority of my customers
> refer to it by version number.
>
> Also, considering Ubuntu is by far the largest used Linux distro, I
> am not sure how much of that is happening in practice.
>
>
> Also very different from my experience. Outside things like docker
> (which most people don't run postgres on - yet?), redhat/centos is
> significantly bigger with my customers.
I should clarify:
When dealing with bare metal -- by far our customer base is
RedHat/CentOS. When dealing with anything cloud, it is by far Debian or
Ubuntu.
>
> Just as a point of input - clearly our customers fall in fairly
> significantly different groups,and we need to be able to deal with both.
>
Absolutely.
>
> I should note that I am not suggesting we forgo version names but
> adding something that is fun could be useful... Something to think
> about.
>
>
>
> FWIW, I believe redhat also has such "code names". Except really
> *nobody* use them there...
True.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh berkus | 2016-04-11 18:04:47 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2016-04-11 17:46:29 | Re: 9.6 -> 10.0 |