Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files
Date: 2016-04-06 16:55:41
Message-ID: 57053F8D.4050409@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/05/2016 09:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Michael Paquier
>> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> Given the lack of any other complaints about this, I'm okay with the
>>>> approach as presented. (I haven't read the patch in detail, though.)
>>>
>>> FWIW, I am still of the opinion that the last patch sent by Peter is
>>> in a pretty good shape.
>>
>> Great. I've marked this patch as "Ready for Committer" in the
>> CommitFest application.
>
> Peter, are you going to commit this? Feature freeze is in just a few days.

done

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2016-04-06 17:19:06 Re: Choosing parallel_degree
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2016-04-06 16:52:14 Re: GIN data corruption bug(s) in 9.6devel