Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L
Date: 2002-01-14 15:17:18
Message-ID: 5702.1011021438@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> writes:
> The problem is, that the default on AIX is to produce architecture
> independent code (arch=COM). Unfortunately not all AIX architectures
> seem to have these instructions.

AIX does more than one architecture? Hmm, s_lock.h doesn't know that...

> With arch=ppc it works (two lines
> adjusted .globl .tas and .tas:). My worry is, that the Architecture
> book sais that the isync is necessary on SMP. I wonder why that would
> not also apply to LinuxPPC or Apple.

I doubt we've had anyone test on SMP PPC machines, other than Tatsuo's
tests on AIX. Worse, I'd imagine that any failures from a missing sync
instruction would be rare and tough to reproduce. So there may indeed
be a lurking problem here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-14 15:29:01 Re: bug in permission handling?
Previous Message guard 2002-01-14 14:56:34 unicode words