| From: | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <adsmail(at)wars-nicht(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Should pgFoundry mentions be nuked from the wiki? |
| Date: | 2016-04-03 19:19:55 |
| Message-ID: | 57016CDB.4010802@wars-nicht.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 22.03.2016 03:54, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 03/21/2016 06:57 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
>> When looking through the wiki, there are various mentions
>> of pgFoundry around. They're not really pointing out that
>> it's extremely legacy/unwanted ;>, and to not put new projects
>> on there.
>>
>> Should we remove the references to it, or make them explicity
>> say something like "Do Not Use pgFoundry for new projects", or
>> <other suggestions welcome>? :)
>
> As far as I know, any active project has moved from pgFoundry. The best
> solution is to find where the new home is and update the links.
When I updated the links in docbot a while ago, for a number projects I
couldn't find more recent links. It probably means that the project is
dead, but the legacy information is nice to have.
Regards,
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group
European PostgreSQL User Group - Board of Directors
Volunteer Regional Contact, Germany - PostgreSQL Project
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scheuref | 2016-04-04 15:16:01 | Re: patch to fix retention in pg_backup_rotated.sh |
| Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2016-04-02 17:52:38 | Re: Wiki uploads not working |