Re: Road to alpha1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Road to alpha1
Date: 2009-08-17 19:01:11
Message-ID: 5701.1250535671@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut escreveu:
>> Possibly, but there aren't going to be any new translations within the
>> next two days. We may want to reconsider this for the next alpha.
>>
> IMHO, it's too much work for an alpha cycle. Why not encourage it _only_ after
> the last commitfest?

But the translation work is incremental, no? You might waste some
effort if the same message is changed more than once in a devel cycle,
but I doubt that's a big problem. Not having to do all the work on a
tight deadline at the end seems well worth it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-08-17 19:07:45 Re: Alpha 1 release notes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-08-17 18:54:04 Re: Another try at reducing repeated detoast work for PostGIS