From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | h(at)husseinnasser(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Transaction wraparound and read committed isolation level |
Date: | 2023-02-21 09:51:42 |
Message-ID: | 56d92102952fff2283f05b8d7712e34bad4647e4.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Sun, 2023-02-19 at 03:10 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/routine-vacuuming.html
> Description:
>
> hey guys
>
> thanks for the work you do we really appreciate it.
>
> In the transaction wraparound section this statement is misleading and got
> me really confused.
>
> “a row version with an insertion XID greater than the current transaction's
> XID is “in the future” and should not be visible to the current
> transaction“
>
> If the current transaction isolation level is read committed it absolutely
> can see rows committed by future transactions with higher XIDs.
You are right, in combination with PlanQualEval you can.
> Would be cool to add a note.
>
> this also bear the question that the wraparound isn’t really a problem with
> default isolation level but more for higher levels such as repeatable read
> and such.
>
> please correct me if my understanding is incorrect.
Wraparound can be a problem on all isolation levels. It has to do with
transaction IDs and visibility.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2023-02-21 14:50:04 | Re: February 9th, 2023 Release links to a missing page |
Previous Message | Jelte Fennema | 2023-02-21 09:40:12 | Add missing meson arguments in docs |