| From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: bdr replication |
| Date: | 2016-03-31 05:50:02 |
| Message-ID: | 56FCBA8A.6050405@hogranch.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 3/30/2016 10:41 PM, Alvaro Aguayo Garcia-Rada wrote:
> What I don't understand is the need of a shared storage in this case. It would be a lot better to have the data folder inside each server virtual disk to avoid troubles with the shared storage; I really see no reason for such configuration here.
I believe what the original poster is trying to say, his physical
servers have a shared storage pool, but each VM has its own private
virtual disks allocated out of this shared pool, and thats what his BDR
database servers are using.
this should be fine, so its a BDR problem. how to diagnose and
repair BDR problems. I have no experience running BDR, so will step
out of this thread (please delete me from CC's).
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Slava Bendersky | 2016-03-31 06:10:30 | Re: bdr replication |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Aguayo Garcia-Rada | 2016-03-31 05:41:17 | Re: bdr replication |