Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: VS 2015 support in src/tools/msvc
Date: 2016-03-29 15:31:43
Message-ID: 56FA9FDF.20108@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 29/03/16 03:06, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>> OK, sounds good.
>>
>> Just a side-note. Andres has pushed the fix for the GinIs* macros as
>> af4472bc, making patch 0003 from the last series useless now.
>
> I'm not prepared to get very involved in this patch series since I am
> not a Windows guy, but I went ahead and pushed 0001 anyway. I'm not
> sure that we want to commit 0002 without a BF machine. Can anybody
> help with that?
>

I have machine ready, waiting for animal name and secret. It will
obviously fail until we push the 0002 and 0004 though.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2016-03-29 15:33:49 Re: WIP: Access method extendability
Previous Message Daniel Verite 2016-03-29 15:31:13 Re: pg_largeobject